#man is delusional and seems to get increasing so with every interview!

[stagefoureddiediaz]

Lfj probably has a neurolink branching implant and generates his answers using AI

Hahahaha Nonnie - I get the feeling his answers would be more coherent and intelligent if he got AI to generate them for him. I also don’t think AI could create that work of fantasy and talk utter nonsense in that way - it’s more intelligent that he is which means it can’t dig into delusion! 😱😱😂😂

[hcgossips]

The Truth Fans Refuse To Accept

Cavill is a single man. He can hook up with a different chic every now and then. And, as a single celeb, it is expected he dates h**ker’s. Unless he’s an eunuch or gay. But, being a conservative and having Cavill staging a conservative persona, his fandon would obviously be shocked with and wouldn’t accept the idea he could like h**ker’s and be a Mayhem client.

Especially, because most of his fans are delusional thinking one day they could be the one, because he always said he’s looking for someone to marry and start a family. That’s bullshit, by the way!  What’s happening, among other things, is that most of his fandom (the ones expecting to be chosen), is suffering with this feeling of being lied to, betrayed, rejected and replaced by a cheap tramp.

Viscuso, who he falsely made the mother of his fake child, to worsen, has been  promoted as a bad ass bitch and a redneck bully. Of course, it was a PR attempt to face the negative publicity, protecting her from it. But, fans bought it. And that increased the feeling of surprise and unconformity. What Cavill (his team) did to those fans was malicious, vicious and disrespectful. He knew how to be pleased  when he needed a fandom to make him who he is today. I feel sorry for his fandom, who believed he was the avatar created to sell his image.

But, it turns out, he isn’t. Yes, he’s a gent, polite, a prince in manners. But, that’s only a facet of his personality. Henry is not really this prince he portrays nor the marrying type expecting to get married soon. He’s not actually looking for a steady relationship at the moment. He doesn’t want one, now. He’s is leaving that for later, maybe when he’s 60 or more. See George Clooney’s history.

Today, if needy, he can call Mayhem when he feels like getting laid, if not an eunuch or gay. He’s still young to get trapped and his temper doesn’t cope with steady relationships. Gamers, who spend hours in front of a computer on their free time, prefer that, to sex or to spending some time with a human. He is still addicted to games and suggested it in recent interviews, making clear that, on his free time, he’s gaming, not spending with a supposed daughter, with whom he shows no connection with.

That type of guy, has gaming as his priorities, not a companionship. He’s not available to a partner and he doesn’t really miss them, unless when he has the urge. A woman in a life of a gamer, suffers too much, because, even physically present, the guy is never there. He probably has his social moments, but most women probably get him bored and have to play the mothering type most of the time.

To attract a man like that, the person has to be very intelligent and always surprise him, making him live in a loop. Because, he gets esily dull. But, the contrary also happens. Geeks are usually boring and childish to women. And, as a geek putting gaming as a priority, sex with them can be a brief experience and tiresome. Cavill doesn’t seem to have much of experiences on relationships.

He doesn’t seem to know how to please a woman. His idea of a perfect date (according to him on an interview) is a nice dinner in an expensive restaurant followed by a good bottle of wine. That seems more a description of a meeting with his manager. He really thinks a woman would be enthusiastic with that? Well, maybe in a prior century, if poor and hungry.

This idea of men taking women for a nice meal and wine as a differential in a relationship is so old-fashioned and sexist. It reduces women to submissive creatures who depend on a man to offer her dinner in an expensive place as a big deal. And more, it reduces women to creatures who expectations in a relationship are shallow and superficial. Yes, I know. Better having dinner in a nice place with a nice company. And, I know Cavill had a traditional Education.

I’m not saying a polite gent, who pays the bills doesn’t make a difference. It does. It shows he knows his part. It’s so rare to see a man being a man these days. What I’m saying is Cavill seems to have a very sexist point of view about the role men and women have in a relationship, where women are passive, submissive and a coadjuvant, who doesn’t have a life of her own, nor great expectations.

Apparently, he sees woman as this dependent being to whom he, as a celeb, can offer the world and who is pleased with shallow and material stuff. He gives me the impression that he thinks material things, nice Hollywood parties (based on another interview he gave) are what he has in mind to please a woman and what a woman would expect from a relationship with him. Well, maybe the PR wannabes, but not a real girlfriend. He imagines his girlfriend as one of his fans or, most likely, his PR stunts, somebody from an ordinary world, who would be pleased and thrilled with a dinner with the Great Cavill, who would also take her to this awsome Hollywood party.

The impression is he fantasizes about a relationship based on his professional shallow experiences, like meeting with his manager or going on PR dates, but nothing based on real relationships. He apparently, imagines this girlfriend coming from a very  simple, ordinary world, different from Hollywood’s glamour. It is as if he believed their highest expectations are eating in a fancy, expensive restaurant and expecting to go to a Hollywood party with him. Brief, shallow and superficial relationships. That’s definitely, not what women want from him. But, maybe it’s all he has had from them and all he manages to give.

And, his ideal of woman is definitely, not what a real woman would expect from him. That’s a wannabe who is happy and pleased to be in a PR stunt with him. These are not real girlfriends, they are women expecting and pleased with the minimum. But he is definitely, not right when thinking this is the perfect boyfriend. Women expect so much more from a relationship. But, how would he know? His dates are, actually, fake with wannabes selected for a plot and managed by contract, who are pleased with that glamour life he can offer.

That’s not real relationship. But, the interesting is this gives him a fake sense of manly power. This is what makes him feel like a man. This guy has been “dating” too many PRs. It’s more than time he starts dating a real woman in a real relationship, for a change and to know what a real woman expects and wants from a man.

But, maybe that’s the point: He has difficulty commiting and his idea of a relationship is very superficial, shallow, empty, limited and deathless, based on work experiences, not real life. In short: a PR stunt. Cavill still doesn’t know what a real relationship with a woman is.

[bleedinglovehes]

liam payne sucks tbh

This compilation is for my dear friend, who goaded me into making a comprehensive list of every time Liam Payne has been openly homophobic in the past ten years, with a couple of bonuses at the end! Because he has been. A lot. He’s displayed his privilege and offended LGBTQ+ people on multiple occasions and shows no signs of even attempting to educate himself or empathize with those his words have hurt. On that note, let us begin this journey.

Let’s start with the obvious, shall we? The infamous Duck Dynasty's Family Values tweet. Anyone who’s been in the One Direction fandom should be able to easily recall the incident, but I’ll break it down for you. On January 18th Liam tweeted about how he loved the “family values” on Duck Dynasty. By that time, it was know that the family was openly homophobic. Just one month prior, in December 2013, the families patriarch (Phil Robertson) was suspended from the show following homophobic remarks that received backlash. (He compared homosexuality to beastiality).Liam immediately received backlash for the tweet, for good reason, so later that day he took to twitter to claim that “Being a fan of someones show and the way they still hold a family together doesn't mean i am ok with all they say”. (https://twitter.com/LiamPayne/status/424679109634314240) That was his “apology”. Now, Liam’s association with the Robertson’s did not end there. 8 months later he posted a happy birthday message from Willie Robertson (Phil’s son) on his instagram. Though his interacting with the Robertsons had upset many LGBT+ people, Liam continued to openly support the family.The very next month he, and close friend Andy Samuels (pay attention to that name, we’ll reference it later) went shooting in Louisiana with the family. Andy and Willie Robertson’s sister in law both posted about the event at the time, but the posts have since been deleted.

Now if you were one of the delusional people still convinced of Liam’s membership in the LGBT+ community, you may find lot’s of faults in my logic. Him supporting a family sticking together doesn’t mean he shares their homophobic values, and you’re right, to an extent. But a queer person would not be so careless. Liam is displaying his privilege as a straight white man by ignoring the disgusting homophobia displayed by the patriarch, and likely shared by his sons and grandchildren. So, with that incident we have, at the very least, hopefully shown the audience Liam’s blatant ignorance when it comes to the LGBT community.

Let’s continue. 2014 was the start of a startling trend of tasteless comments Mr. I-Used-To-Be-In-1D-Now-I’m-Free has made in relation to the community. In August of 2015, Liam said that Girl Almighty (a One Direction song he wrote on) is about "trying to find that number one woman of your life” which would have been fine, except he went on to say that “none of [the fans] can relate to, because most of you are girls. Except for the boys in here, you know what I'm talking about." Almost immediately, his remarks were under fire for being too heteronormative, and he was accused of being homophobic. Instead of using the incident as a learning experience, Liam took to twitter to first clarify he is “in no way shape or form homophobic that's a ridicules thing to say and I'm not here to offend people so take it as you will”. Essentially, rather than apologize to every LGBT girl at the show, he decided to say since he’s not homophobic the comments weren’t offensive. He went on in another tweet and called the statement that deeply offended his non straight female fans “throwaway”. All I can gather from his little twitter tirade is that Liam was upset that his “throwaway” comment hurt LGBT people and that those people would not let it go. He finished by tweeting “crap end to a good day”, blaming the backlash rather than his own ignorant comment. All of the tweets are still on twitter and a quick search will bring them up for you.

2015 was a big year for Liam in terms of casual homophobia, and just one month after the Girl Almighty Incident, he was back at it again with… The Pride Flag Incident. Now, to provide some background, pride flags started making appearances at the shows in large numbers thanks to The Rainbow Project. The project was started to promote a safe space for LGBTQ+ fans. It garnered a lot of attention and the starters of the project clarified several times that it had nothing to do with the infamous “Larry” ship, which I will not discuss as frankly it’s not relevant to my main point. So a month before the Pride Flag Incident The Rainbow Project was getting attention from the media. Anyone who took two seconds to research the project and motivation behind it would know that it was only to support queer fans.

Okay but seriously, the Pride Flag Incident was a big deal. Let me explain. In the summer of 2015, gay marriage was legalized in the US. LGBTQ Americans were absolutely thrilled, for good reason, and pride flags were seen in abundance. So here’s what happened. Liam was interviewed by Attitude, a UK gay magazine. Now he started off alright, claiming that he found it, “funny that being gay is still something that’s talked about as though it’s not natural”. The use of the term “funny” is… troublesome for me, but that’s not the issue with the article. It’s his next statements that, once again, show his ignorance. He talked about there being an increase in rainbow flags at One Direction shows following the legalization of gay marriage. He made the correct point and he should've stopped there. Unfortunately, he continued, saying “I think that was mainly because people think of the Louis and Harry thing, which is absolutely nuts and drives me insane.” Once again he ignored the huge queer fanbase One Direction had amassed at that point and was subject to backlash. He, once again, took to twitter and, once again, stood by his ignorant comments rather than make a real apology. I won’t bring up Harry. I won’t bring up Harry. I won’t bring up Harry. I won’t bring up Harry… ok fine I have to. Harry actually waved a pride flag at the next concert they had. AKA, the one right after Liam’s comments were made public. Harry was, according to Liam, one of the people being disrespected by the pride flags.

I’m sensing a trend here. Liam makes an ignorant comment that offends people, Liam goes on twitter and stands by the ignorant comments, Liam claims people offended are in the wrong. Moving on, I'm honestly not sure what Liam did in 2016. I think that’s when Strip That Down was released. Anyways he only offended…. every one direction stan with that.

2017 though, that one was big. That’s when Liam made The Clothing Comments. So in May he was on the radio, probably promoting something, and was asked which members of One Direction he would let watch his child. He said that he’d pick Louis, because he’s a dad, and that neither Harry nor Niall made the cut. The issue? His reasoning behind why Harry wasn’t a suitable babysitter was that, “I couldn’t rely on Harry because I feel that my child would come out dressed in something that I just wouldn’t understand”. Yet. Another. Ignorant. Comment. Harry had, beginning in 2014 and continuing to 2020, been dressing in a non traditionally masculine way. 2014 had him sporting pussy bow blouses while 2020 has gifted us with a lace jumpsuit equipped with matching lace gloves. Now, therein lays the issue with his comment. Harry doesn’t dress in a traditionally masculine way. That was apparent in 2017. That’s what Liam had an issue with. Also, Liam has been making comments about Harry’s fashion sense on a semi consistent basis since that article dropped so… yea.

2018’s… incident… is almost funny to me because once again Liam display’s absolute ignorance when it comes to the LGBT community. It began with Liam taking place in Adidas’s Prouder campaign in June. It was sponsored by a bunch of celebrities and an article was released where each gave a quote about what makes them proud, obviously in relation to Pride. When Liam was asked the question he answered “I think since I’ve had a little boy, everything changes in life. ‘I’m aiming more for him to be prouder of me, and already he’s making me a better man, which I think is incredible.’” He did not reference the community he was supposedly supporting. He received immense backlash for his “straight pride” comments on twitter and gay news outlet Pink News.All in all it was just insensitive. He was dragged on twitter for not knowing the meaning of pride and the movement he was supporting.That’s not where the incident ended though. On July 7th London hosted the annual Pride Parade, that I’ve heard Liam promised to attend. I do not have receipts for this, so my next point may seem a little weak at first, but stay with me. Instead of attending the event, Liam attended a Dolce and Gabbana fashion show. Why might that be an issue? Well, since 2015, the fashion label has been called homophobic after two directors made insensitive comments about same sex parenting. So, if you don’t believe he promised to attend the show, the fact that he attended a show for a homophobic brand should upset you.In fact, Liam has shown no indication of distancing from the brand. In contrast, Harry has only been seen wearing Dolce and Gabbana once since the comments were made. (Performing on the Jimmy Kimmel show in Nov. 2015). Liam has worn D&G several times in the years since the comments were made.

2019 was a bad year for Liam, and not just because he took Zayn, Harry, and Niall’s number ones and slapped them together to debut at #111 on the Billboard Hot 100. In July he was paid by the Saudi Regime to perform in Saudi Arabia. The issue? In Saudi Arabia being gay is a crime and women’s rights activists are jailed. Nicki Minaj was also set to perform at the festival but backed out due to the Saudi Regime’s blatant homophobia and sexism. Once again he displayed his ignorance and privilege. He’s not queer, he’s not a woman. So he accepted the money and performed. Now I know he had fans there excited to see him, but he made the wrong choice. He should’ve backed out and not accepted any money from the Saudi Regime. July was just not a good month for Liam.So he was asked whether or not he planned to vote in the election. His response? “I think I will vote but I am always out of the country. We need a mobile app where we can vote with our thumbprint or something. I mean, in regards to Boris or Jeremy, I don’t think we give people enough time. Same with West Brom football club. They always change their manager every week it seems and we never get time to gel with anybody.” He’s just so ignorant. As a rich white straight man, the election had no effect on him. He seemed to indicate a preference for Boris Johnson, a racist sexist homophobe. December was by far his worst though. So his debut album, LP1, dropped at the beginning of the month. Immediately, Liam was attacked for his fetishization of bisexual woman, seen in the song “Both Ways”. It’s just disgusting, and made worse by his history with the LGBTQ community. A straight man singing about how hot it is that his girlfriend likes girls is just… so bad. That whole incident speaks for itself in my opinion. That brings us to the reappearance of his comments about Harry’s clothing. He claimed that “I couldn’t put myself in that. I’d look fucking… It’d look weird.” Now, has anyone seen what Liam has worn over the years? Liam’s issue is that the Met Gala look was feminine. He’s claimed to be the antichrist version of Harry, and you know what? I see it. He’s a straight man uncomfortable with men wearing feminine clothing and gay people in general. Harry is a queer man who thrives in feminine styled or women’s clothing. They really are opposites.

So what have I established? A pattern of ignorance that have hurt LGBT people on multiple occasions. Now, ignorance does not equate homophobia, so here’s how we know. Remember his friend Andy Samuels? Well he’s been openly homophobic (and sexist) on his social media. He’s been friends with Liam for over a decade. Remember when Harry made his iconic “not that important” comment? Liam’s reaction is… troublesome. He does a short laugh, and then glances off camera with an uncomfortable look on his face. Take from that what you will. There are UNCONFIRMED rumors of Liam using homophobic language backstage at One Direction concerts. Like with his reaction to Harry’s “not that important'' comment, there is no proof, but, based on his other actions, I am inclined to believe it happened. So there you have it. Liam’s history of ignorance. Homophobia is defined as a “dislike of or prejudice against homosexual people”. I think it’s safe to say that applies to Liam. He’s uncomfortable with feminine styled men, supports homophobes (The Duck Dynasty family, Dolce and Gabbana, Boris Johnson), and makes ignorant comments that are extremely offensive to LGBTQ people. He may not go around screaming slurs, but he is homophobic. He’s the type of homophobic person who claims not to be because he knows a gay person. Who claims the pattern of ignorance is simply the fault of the one getting offended. That’s who Liam Payne is. Look, you don’t have to agree that he’s homophobic, but you have to agree that he’s ignorant and refuses to get educated. And you have to admit that there is no way he’s LGBT. There is no way anyone could orchestrate a smear campaign that relied on so many casually ignorant statements and incidences.

This post was not my fault. Really. It’s wasn’t. It’s actually my friend’s fault. She told me that there were people on tumblr who actually believe Liam Payne is LGBTQ+. Shocking, I know. She also said that some people were comparing the experiences of Liam, a straight man, to Harry, his queer former bandmate. Which, no? And because I am so sure people will deny everything I have presented, a link to a google doc with links to each article and tweet I referenced has been included. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1i2lWQPr0oQeA_MYLdkmp6G19waj9KSYaQgcBek8O2OE/edit?usp=sharing

[lubbuthedigitalnomad]

IN ONLY @1000 WORDS — Clarity, Communication, Politics, and Religious Arrogance

About the Author

Doug “Ten” Rose may be the biggest smartass as well as one of the most entertaining survivors of the hitchhiking adventurers that used to cover America’s highways. He is the author of the books Fearless Puppy on American Road and Reincarnation Through Common Sense, has survived heroin addiction and death, and is a graduate of over a hundred thousand miles of travel without ever driving a car, owning a phone, or having a bank account.

Hello from the Himalayas! 

I hope you are happy, healthy, and enjoying the winter. Things are just beginning to possibly change for the better. There are logical reasons to think that 2021 will be a better year than 2020 was and, in a few months, Spring and the new life it brings may witness some progress in the human condition. From out here, it looks like we will have to remember at least two things in order to have any chance of that progress taking hold.

1. Staying active on behalf of the lessons we’ve learned is essential. The Himalayas didn’t briefly become visible again by accident. It happened because people and their machines started pumping less crap into the atmosphere. The environment is certainly not the only issue at hand — but if that issue isn’t addressed immediately, there won’t be any other issues.

2. Many of us see life through the wool that has been pulled over our eyes, and attend to illusions and delusions more than we attend to the world we would see without them. No matter how unpleasant reality is in spots, we cannot allow ourselves to be frozen into inaction by externally manufactured and dangerously manipulative bullshit, or internally manufactured fears and frustrations.

“The greatest thing a human soul ever does in this world is to see something and tell what it saw in a plain way. Hundreds of people can talk for one who can think, but thousands can think for one who can see. To see clearly is poetry, prophecy, and religion all rolled into one.”

John Ruskin

This is an excerpt from the book Fearless Puppy On American Road

Mary and I have hitchhiked over fifty thousand miles together by now. We are not judgmental or prejudicial but have put in enough observation time and earned enough experiential education to recognize some patterns in humanity.

Three Types of Communication

When you are hitchhiking, there are three types of communication that you can have with your host. These are:- a shallow conversation, a deeper conversation, and silence. Silence speaks for itself. It can range from uncomfortable through comfortable, and on to transcendent.

The shallow conversation mode may have more of religion and politics in it. Many people seem to think that just choosing these topics to speak about qualifies the conversation as being in deep mode. I have to disagree. Regardless, politics and religion seem to be the most popular subjects in human dialogue.

The evidence of fifty thousand miles worth of listening suggests that many folks may not give these subjects as much thought as they should before they open their mouths about them. That doesn’t seem to stop many of my fellow humans from talking about these subjects for hours on end — and thinking that their personal opinions should become global mandates.

I can sum up what I’ve learned from listening to several thousand hours of conversation on these subjects in two very short chapters.

Defeating Organized Religious Distortion

The quality of attention paid by the student is more important than who the teacher is. A kind Christian is better than a harmful Buddhist. A kind Buddhist is better than a harmful Christian.

Jesus is not going to keep you dry if you piss into the wind.

(Almost) every religion is waiting for someone to come save us. Jesus is going to come back and save the Christians, Messiah is going to come to save the Jews, etc. My guess is that all this divine saving comes later. There seems to be a lot of saving that needs done by us amateurs before the professionals get here.

Some folks think that Salvation will never come. Some folks think that it’s already here. It seems more likely that Salvation has been circling the planet for a very long time but can’t find a suitable place to land! Unless each individual human on Earth starts taking on the serious tasks of saving both themselves and their fellow humans, we will disappear as a species — with or without God’s help.

There have been many examples of how very capable we are of getting the job done if we would all just get about doing it.

Ending Political Malfeasance

Some politicians may be less full of shit than others. Maybe not. Maybe some are just better at hiding it. As a rule, politicians get to be more full of shit as they climb higher up the political ladder. Some start out full of shit. Some actually start out with the altruistic intention that would be necessary to do the job correctly. After a period of time, they also succumb to the necessity of playing the game and the self-interest that has become the basis of political systems.

The self-interest of the rich and powerful in every society seems to have consistently required the compromise (or martyrdom) of that society’s authentic leaders. Couple that general coercion and threat with the more personalized temptations (money, sex, power, cars, control, etc.) offered to those who would be public servants and leaders, and the result is the sacrifice of moral priorities by those climbing up the ladder and…

Actually, all of the above is a very shortsighted observation. None of these malfunctions are the fault of individual politicians, even the most despicable ones. It is the duty as well as the right of the public to install the systems and representatives that we want to be governed by. Politicians are indeed full of shit, but the public is responsible for that. We let the situation get out of control and we are the only ones who can potentially reel it back in.

Politicians don’t rate praise or blame. We do.

Supposedly, the government is in the process of saving us from several varieties of terrorists. No one has quite figured out who is going to save us from the government, and from the power brokers that bend government to their will. It seems it will have to be us.

Part of what we built works great. Part of what we built badly needs fixing. It is delusional to think that a few politicians can fix what took several hundred million people to build — and run down.

And The Very Next Ride…

From New Orleans, we got a ride with an annoyingly loud evangelist preacher. He was driving his brand new Cadillac to Houston for a big revival meeting that would reap him “many souls and dollars to do HIS work, Amen.” The man was wearing enough money in diamond rings to feed a small nation.

After about an hour of his self-righteous attempts to convert us in the name of his Lord (who, it seemed, also had a very good credit rating, no concern for humanity, and the ability to prattle on at a pace that would scare the shit out of an auctioneer), we asked to be let off at the next exit.

“But I’m going all the way to Houston,” said our host, who it seemed had mistaken himself for The Host.

“Thank you anyway, but we won’t be going with you.”

We got out of the car and walked to the nearest town for coffee. Mary showed me what the preacher had inspired her to write during her silent hour in his luxury car’s back seat. She was so impressed by the arrogance of one of his statements that she quoted it as the title.

“I Think What God Meant to Say”

“You think you know everything, in general. This seems to interfere with you knowing anything specifically. You crisscross the country as quickly as delusions cross your mind, as quickly as mindless platitudes fly from your mouth. You maintain a facade of happiness, but it is only a vehicle for salesmanship. You strive to control the weak and gain stability through materialism. Your pace is too fast, false, and graceless for the normal human to want to learn from. Your only visible value is teaching by negative example. You are what not to do. You are who not to be.

“You are trapped in the quicksand of your own outdated bullshit. How could you be expected to re-examine preconceived notions when you run so quickly past thought in order to reach manipulation? You don’t have the time or heart to pay attention to your own conscience, much less anyone else’s needs.

“Professed internal wholeness is belied by your fragmented external judgments and condemnations. You relay pretentious truths of minimal depth with maximum coercion. I heard them all a thousand lifetimes ago!

“Business gets done. Profits, not prophets, have made you pay them a heavy price. It’s not my way.

“Go on by yourself!”

Mary was a very smart woman. She was also an exceptionally kind-hearted, patient person and rarely had a bad word to say about anyone. I think the few paragraphs above are as ill as she ever spoke of another living thing.

The books Fearless Puppy On American Road and Reincarnation Through Common Sense by this same author are also available through Amazon or the website, where there are sample chapters from those books. Very entertaining TV/radio interviews with and newspaper articles about the author are also available there. There is no charge for anything but the complete books! All author profits from book sales will be donated to help sponsor an increase in the number of wisdom professionals on Earth, beginning with but certainly not limited to Buddhist monks and nuns.

If you missed the Introduction to the new book that will be titled Temple Dog Soldier or would like to see several chapters of it that are available for free online, go to the Puppy website Blog section. This is a book in progress. You will be reading it as it is being created! Just like you, I don’t know what the next chapter is going to be about until it is written. As the Intro will tell you, this is a totally true story — and probably the only book ever written by and about a corpse journeying completely around the world!

FEARLESS PUPPY WEBSITE BLOG

FEARLESS PUPPY ON AMERICAN ROAD/AMAZON PAGE

REINCARNATION THROUGH COMMON SENSE/AMAZON PAGE

FEARLESS WEBSITE (About Author section)

[legionnaireslover]

Get a load of the crap remark from the Jazzie gal! BC has NEVER done a “180” about his marriage or family because he has NEVER EVER said anything that lines up with any of the Haters “theories”! You can’t do a “180” about something that you have been diametrically opposed to since day one and never wavered in that opinion!

A fact that the Haters conveniently ignore is that BC’s stance has ALWAYS been that he is deeply in love with Sophie, adores his children, and has always proudly worn his wedding band as a public indication of his marital status.

And, oh yeah, another fact they ALWAYS seem to forget to mention is he publicly stated that those people who dismiss his marriage and family (Haters in other words) as PR are scary, delusional and obsessive!

Now why do you think the Septics want everyone to have amnesia about those facts????? Hmm, let me think! 🤔 Could it be that it would make it crystal clear that all these accusations against Sophie are just made up by the Septics and have no basis in reality?

Haters are not only liars they also KNOW they are lying about these falsehoods! That’s why they insist on calllng his heartfelt remarks about his marriage and family “shoehorning” and “PR”. It is the only lame-ass answer they have to try and hide from the mountain of increasing evidence against their convoluted and stupid lies!

Let’s look at just the actions and words of BC in the past year and ask yourself... does this sound like a guy who is setting up a “divorce” and getting ready to claim that his progeny “isn’t his”????

- His company announced that Sophie Hunter would be included in the production credits of a planned project (the End We Start From) based on a book written by Sophie’s brother’s wife.

- He clearly stated in an interview that he was careful not to distress his wife about the harrowing material in TCiT because he doesn’t want work to intrude on his personal homelife.

- He also was quoted in an interview that he is careful not to exhibit wide dramatically sourced mood swings while rehearsing lines in front of his children.

- In another interview he said he chose his projects to be as close as possible to his family.

- He was shown in a video answering the question about his favourite vacation as being with his wife and children. And emphasized it didn’t really matter the location. It was who he was with that was the most important thing.

- He was seen in multiple videos with his wife at a music/literary festival (the Wilderness Festival) this past year.

- He was photographed with Sophie coming out of a play (the Ferryman).

- He was photographed with his arm closely around Sophie in Angels in America.

- He talked quite a bit about the impending birth of his second child in March of this year and has confirmed after the birth that he does have a second child (in various interviews) and is a father of 2 boys.

- He was photographed with Sophie in a park with a baby in his lap (and the caption said it was Hal).

- He was photographed with Sophie coming out of a Christmas party.

- He said that his wife was his favourite person to have dinner with.

Do these things seem to indicate the storyline the Haters are trying to sell???

Or do these things seem to tell of a man who is very well known just trying to live a personal life with his family out of the glare of public scrutiny as much as possible when he is a world-wide celebrity. Of course he is going to be papped and interviewed and quoted. That’s inevitable in his line of work. So we do get occasional glimpses at his private life.

He isn’t ashamed of his wife and children after all. As one interviewer discovered despite him trying to keep his family away from the glare of public scrutiny he naturally can’t help himself sometimes because his family is so much a part of his life! So some things do get photographed or mentioned.

But it doesn’t mean he is “shoehorning” it at every opportunity. And Sophie is pretty good at staying in the background, if you ask me. Far from being the “famewhore” the Haters try and paint her as, she isn’t seen a lot in public (especially since her family doubled in size, she is naturally as busy as any mother would be with two very young children).

And if Sophie has a smile on her face (as she did a couple of weeks ago cooking out of a party with her hand firmly gasped in her husband’s as they negotiated some icy steps in the glare of pap cameras) who can blame her. She is the wife/partner of a hugely talented man, the mother of a couple of boys that no doubt inherited some pretty good genes, on both sides, and a woman who is talented in her own field as well (and about to embark on a new venture as executive producer in a Sunnymarch project hopefully). I think I would be smiling too if I were her!

As for the haters like Jazzie... all their so-called “theories” and bold-faced outright lies don’t make a lick of sense if someone isn’t looking through Hater Spectacles! Luckily their putrid hatred of BC’s wife and family isn’t going to factor into how he lives his life. And that just makes the Haters choke whenever they think about it. Too bad, so sad! Bitter, bitter, sour grapes!

If a split does happen, and it doesn’t look like it’s coming soon, we’ll be sad for their kids. That’s all. Couple split all the time, it’s always sad when there’s children involved, but that’s life. No one, and I mean no one, will magically start to agree with the septics. Because I can very much guarantee that if Ben and Sophie do seperate, there’s not going to be a “not his” scenario. There’s nothing dodgy about their relationship, they act like a normal, private couple. Only in haterland do people see something wrong. All I’m hoping for, is for new pictures of Ben and Sophie together, or simply a shot of the magic ring. That is sure to blow the septics tiny little brain. And I wonder how many of them will go away, because none of them will ever admit being wrong.

[titheguerrero]

The Ultimate Version of Ill-Informed Health Care Leadership: Dumb, Incoherent, Confused, Perhaps Psychotic Things President Trump Says and Does About Health Care Policy

The controversy over the Affordable Care Act, aka "Obamacare," still goes on in the US.  The ACA, which is still the law of the land after congressional Republicans made attempts to repeal and replace it, was meant to increase access to health care by increasing access to health care insurance without disturbing the current US reliance on private, mostly for-profit health insurance companies It used a variety of complex, if not Rube Goldberg like mechanisms to tweak the US health care market. During the past month, President Trump has produced some dumbfounding verbiage concerning the basic issues of health care and health policy that provide the context for this controversy The Scope of the Problem: "Fixing Somebody's Back or Their Knee" Per the Hill, Oct 7, 2017, when asked about health care block grants, President Trump said,

I want to focus on North Korea, I want to focus on Iran, I want to focus on other things. I don't want to focus on fixing somebody's back or their knee or something. Let the states do that.

The ACA, of course, affects not just a limited range of elective orthopedic procedures, but the entire scope of US health and health care, from acute care for severe problems, to management of common diseases, to public health.  Trump appeared to totally underestimate the scope of the health care issues about which he so cavalierly opined The Approach: "Vaccilate Daily" An analysis in the Washington Post on October 18, 2017 showed Trump's wildly inconsistent approach to the specifics of managing the ACA.

Early Tuesday, Trump decided upon a justification for his controversial decision to cancel Obamacare payments to insurers that subsidized policies for low-income Americans: The insurance companies are getting rich off this stuff, he claimed. His argument was dubious at best; insurance companies are making lots of money, but not on Obamacare plans. And not only that, but Trump then suggested at a news conference that he actually supported a newly struck deal that would restore the payments that he had said were lining insurance-company pockets. And then he did a 180. He told the Heritage Foundation later Tuesday that 'Congress must find a solution to the Obamacare mess instead of providing bailouts to insurance companies.' Then he tweeted the same Wednesday morning. I am supportive of Lamar as a person & also of the process, but I can never support bailing out ins co's who have made a fortune w/ O'Care. — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 18, 2017 Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) who spearheaded the deal with Democratic Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.), is now suggesting Trump pulled the rug out from underneath him. Lamar Alexander to press, per @GarrettHaake: 'The president called me 10 days ago and asked me to work with Senator Murray to do this' — Benjy Sarlin (@BenjySarlin) October 18, 2017

If I counted that correctly, that was four reversals starting on Oct 17.  The article's conclusion that the president "seemed to vacillate daily" appears too kind. Over a short period of time he repeatedly contradicted himself, demonstrating wild inconsistency.  The Responsibilities of the President: From "Gonna Blow That Thing Up" to "Its Dead.  It's Gone" The ACA is still the law of the land.  As a Vox opinion piece by Professor Abe Gluck of Yale Law School on Oct 17, 2017, reminds us that

The president has a legal obligation, under Article II of the US Constitution, to 'take Care that the laws be faithfully executed.' That means he must make sure that our laws are implemented in good faith and that he uses his executive discretion reasonably toward that end.

However, it appears that President Trump's believes he is entitled to wreck, not implement the law.  For example, per the Guardian, Oct 15, 2017, Steve Bannon, President Trump's last campaign manager and former White House strategic adviser said about the president's approach to the Affordable Care Act,

Not gonna make the CSR [cost-sharing reduction] payments, gonna blow that thing up, gonna blow those [insurance] exchanges up, right?

How could a president "faithfully execute" a law by "blowing up" fundamental sections it? Also, per the Guardian, Oct 16, 2017, when asked about "the Republicans' failure to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA),"

'Obamacare is finished,' Trump told reporters before a cabinet meeting. 'It’s dead. It’s gone. You shouldn’t even mention it. It’s gone. There is no such thing as Obamacare any more.'

However, since the law has not been repealed, per the constitution, it is very much still in existence. Furthermore, Prof Gluck documented specific actions Trump has taken to "blow up" the law.  He first noted that

The ACA requires the federal government to support the open enrollment period — in which individuals must sign up for insurance or lose their chance to do so. The ACA requires the federal government to, among other things, maintain a website and work with local “navigators” and other groups to educate consumers and encourage them to sign up for insurance.

However, Gluck alleged that Trump has sabotaged the law by cutting the open enrollment period in half, scheduled  extensive shutdowns of the enrollment website, canceled previously "scheduled events in which federal officials had planned to visit states and help with enrollment, cut by 90% the federal advertising for open enrollment, and cut funding for the navigator program by 40%. So rather than "faithfully execute" this law, he seems to be simultaneously sabotaging multiple sections of it. Citing Trump's statement that Obamacare is already dead (see above), Prof Gluck maintained,

Motive matters, with respect to whether the president exercises his power legally. If the president exercises his discretion to further the purpose of a statute, he complies with the take care clause. If he uses his power pretextually or unreasonably, he violates the Constitution. President Trump’s motives are unambiguous.

Per the title of his article, Prof Gluck declared "that's illegal." Underlying It All: Complete Gibberish On Oct 23, 2017, a Vox article by Matthew Yglesias discussed Trump's interview with Maria Bartiromo on the Fox Business Channel.  The article provided this transcript of Trump's discussion the proposed legislation by Senators Alexander and Murphy (the same legislation that provoked many reversals from Trump as above.)

Well, I’ve — I have looked at it very, very strongly. And pretty much, we can do almost what they’re getting. I — I think he is a tremendous person. I don’t know Sen. Murray. I hear very, very good things. I know that Lamar Alexander’s a fine man, and he is really in there to do good for the people. We can do pretty much what we have to do without, you know, the secretary has tremendous leeway in the — under the Obama plans. One of the things that they did, because they were so messed up, they had no choice but to give the secretary leeway because they knew he’d have to be — he or she would have to be changing all the time. And we can pretty much do whatever we have to do just the way it is. So this was going to be temporary, prior to repeal and replace. We’re going to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Yglesias made a heroic attempt to extract some meaning from this response, by suggesting that Trump judges the bill "entirely on the basis of his personal impressions of the legislators involved," although he also allowed "Trump has no information about, interest in, or knowledge of the substance of the bill." Again, that is too kind.  Trump did not decline to answer, or say that this issue was one in which he was not interested (as he did above by dismissing it as involving only "bad backs and knees.") Instead, most of Trump's verbiage was entrirely incoherent.  I challenge anyone to make sense out of the phrases highlighted above.  At best he seems to care so little about this issue that he cannot be bothered to make a coherent response.  At worst, this demonstrates he becomes temporarily incapable of rational speech or thought.  Parts of the passages above suggest the word salad produced by somebody with fluent aphasia versus the nonsensical responses produced by patients suffering from acute delusional states.  And just to ice the cake, when asked about the Federal Reserve Bank during the same interview, Trump replied that it is

important psychotically

Again, I wonder if Yglesias was being too kind in concluding that he "meant to say 'psychologically.'" Discussion We have discussed the doctrine of managerialism promoted in business schools that people trained in management should lead every type of human organization and endeavor.  Management by people from the disciplines most relevant to the mission and nature of particular organizations should be eschewed.  So managers, not physicians or other health care professionals, should lead health care organizations.  Following that theme, managers, or those like them, rather than health care professionals and health policy experts should lead health policy.  However, managers who run health care organizations, or make policy, have an unfortunate tendency to be ill-informed (as well as unsympathetic if not hostile to health care professionals' value and the health care mission, and subject to perverse incentives that often put short-term revenue ahead of the health of patients and the population.) In some sense, President Trump is the ultimate embodiment of managerialism.  He is a life long businessman, whose highest academic training resulted in an MBA from the Wharton School, with no demonstrated knowledge of or experience in public policy, the law, or the US Constitution.  Yet for years he has felt free to make pronouncements about any subject which caught his eye. Now he is in charge of health care and health care policy at the federal level, amongst other things. In this role, Mr Trump also appears to be the ultimate embodiment of ill-informed leadership, a term that again now appears much too kind. His message and actions have been not just ill-informed, but dumb, incoherent, confused, and possibly psychotic. As I have said before,... We need health policy leadership that is well-informed, understands the health care mission, avoids self-interest and conflicts of interest, and is accountable, ethical and honest.   (Of course, we have often said we need leadership of health care organizations with these characteristics.) Instead, as Mr Yglesias concluded,

On some level, it’s a little bit funny. On another level, Puerto Rico is still languishing in the dark without power (and in many cases without safe drinking water) with no end in sight. Trump is less popular at this point in his administration than any previous president despite a generally benign economic climate, and shows no sign of changing course. Perhaps it will all work out for the best, and someday we’ll look back and chuckle about the time when we had a president who didn’t know anything about anything that was happening and could never be counted on to make coherent, factual statements on any subject. But traditionally, we haven’t elected presidents like that — for what have always seemed like pretty good reasons — and the risks of compounding disaster are still very much out there.

Article source:Health Care Renewal